References and Resources
Rated 5 out of 5
- The international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) at 3 years: an analysis of 4,658 registered protocols on inplasy.com, platform features, and website statistics. Canellas et al. Front. Res. Metr. Anal., 31 July 2023
- Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Pieper, D & Rombey, T. Systematic Reviews 11, 8 2022.
- Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.
- Moher D. The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. BMJ 2013; 347:f5040
- Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.
- Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, the PRISMA-P Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015.349:g7647.
- Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF; PRISMA-IPD Development Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1657-1665.
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777-784.
- McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388-396
- A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. de Vries RBM, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, van Luijk J, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M and Wever KE. Evidence-Based Preclinical Medicine, 2015; 2(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1002/ebm2.7
- Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editor(s). Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach (updated October 2013). GRADE Working Group, 2013.
- Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017.
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6 (updated 2019), Cochrane, 2019
- Stewart L, Moher D, Shekelle P. Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Systematic Reviews 2012; 1:7