About INPLASY
A global home for transparent research.
We help researchers make their evidence synthesis protocols visible, citable and accessible. Since 2020, our community has grown across borders, disciplines and research designs.
Systematic reviews · Meta-analyses · Scoping reviews · Methodological studies
Updated 16 September 2026 · Website analytics: 1 May 2020 – 16 September 2026
Our purpose
Better evidence starts with
clear, shared methods.
Make research plans visible.
To provide researchers worldwide with the opportunity to register and share evidence synthesis protocols rapidly and without barriers. INPLASY helps reduce duplication of research efforts, minimizes reporting bias, and promotes transparency and integrity in scientific research.
A platform with global reach.
To deliver an innovative global platform for the registration of evidence synthesis protocols.
Connecting researchers through a public record of their planned methods.
Our global reach
Research that reaches
across borders.
Authors from 100 countries have registered protocols with INPLASY. Our website has reached readers in 192 countries and territories.
A community of authors.
A worldwide audience.
Protocol registrations show where our contributing authors are based. Website views show where people access the platform. Explore both lists below to see the breadth of INPLASY’s international presence.
100 Countries with registered protocols
Researchers from these countries have contributed protocols to INPLASY. Each country appears once, including countries represented in international collaborations.
100 countries
- 01Afghanistan
- 02Angola
- 03Australia
- 04Austria
- 05Bahrain
- 06Bangladesh
- 07Belgium
- 08Bolivia
- 09Brazil
- 10Bulgaria
- 11Burkina Faso
- 12Cambodia
- 13Canada
- 14Chile
- 15China
- 16Colombia
- 17Congo
- 18Côte d’Ivoire
- 19Croatia
- 20Cyprus
- 21Czechia
- 22Denmark
- 23Ecuador
- 24Egypt
- 25Estonia
- 26Ethiopia
- 27Finland
- 28France
- 29Gambia
- 30Germany
- 31Ghana
- 32Greece
- 33Hungary
- 34India
- 35Indonesia
- 36Iran
- 37Iraq
- 38Ireland
- 39Israel
- 40Italy
- 41Jamaica
- 42Japan
- 43Jordan
- 44Kazakhstan
- 45Kenya
- 46Kosovo
- 47Kuwait
- 48Latvia
- 49Lebanon
- 50Libya
- 51Lithuania
- 52Malawi
- 53Malaysia
- 54Mexico
- 55Morocco
- 56Mozambique
- 57Myanmar
- 58Netherlands
- 59New Zealand
- 60Nigeria
- 61North Macedonia
- 62Norway
- 63Oman
- 64Pakistan
- 65Palestine
- 66Peru
- 67Philippines
- 68Poland
- 69Portugal
- 70Qatar
- 71Romania
- 72Russia
- 73Saudi Arabia
- 74Senegal
- 75Serbia
- 76Singapore
- 77Slovakia
- 78Slovenia
- 79Somalia
- 80South Africa
- 81South Korea
- 82Spain
- 83Sri Lanka
- 84Sudan
- 85Sweden
- 86Switzerland
- 87Syria
- 88Taiwan
- 89Tanzania
- 90Thailand
- 91Tunisia
- 92Türkiye
- 93Uganda
- 94United Arab Emirates
- 95United Kingdom
- 96United States
- 97Uzbekistan
- 98Vietnam
- 99Yemen
- 100Zambia
No countries match your search. Try another name.
Names are standardized. Hong Kong and Macao are included under China; England and Scotland are included under the United Kingdom. Taiwan and Kosovo retain their separate entries in the supplied registration list.
192 Countries & territories accessing INPLASY
Website views by country or territory for 1 May 2020 – 16 September 2026. The analytics export records territories separately.
192 countries and territories
| Country / territory | Views | Share* |
|---|---|---|
| China | 328,776 | 35.11% |
| United States | 117,564 | 12.56% |
| India | 43,969 | 4.70% |
| United Kingdom | 35,792 | 3.82% |
| Brazil | 33,162 | 3.54% |
| Portugal | 28,030 | 2.99% |
| Hong Kong SAR China | 25,035 | 2.67% |
| Germany | 25,020 | 2.67% |
| Taiwan | 23,324 | 2.49% |
| Australia | 19,089 | 2.04% |
| Canada | 18,346 | 1.96% |
| Spain | 17,039 | 1.82% |
| Malaysia | 15,482 | 1.65% |
| Singapore | 12,124 | 1.29% |
| Japan | 11,876 | 1.27% |
| South Korea | 11,782 | 1.26% |
| Italy | 10,856 | 1.16% |
| Chile | 9,435 | 1.01% |
| France | 8,007 | 0.86% |
| Mexico | 7,847 | 0.84% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6,937 | 0.74% |
| Colombia | 6,874 | 0.73% |
| Philippines | 6,790 | 0.73% |
| Indonesia | 6,389 | 0.68% |
| Belgium | 6,329 | 0.68% |
| Thailand | 6,117 | 0.65% |
| Ireland | 5,648 | 0.60% |
| Netherlands | 5,239 | 0.56% |
| Poland | 4,574 | 0.49% |
| Peru | 4,429 | 0.47% |
| Switzerland | 4,158 | 0.44% |
| Israel | 4,057 | 0.43% |
| Türkiye | 3,705 | 0.40% |
| Sweden | 3,654 | 0.39% |
| Romania | 3,328 | 0.36% |
| Greece | 3,309 | 0.35% |
| Nigeria | 3,255 | 0.35% |
| Russia | 2,793 | 0.30% |
| South Africa | 2,611 | 0.28% |
| Finland | 2,436 | 0.26% |
| Pakistan | 2,201 | 0.24% |
| Egypt | 2,144 | 0.23% |
| Ecuador | 2,062 | 0.22% |
| Macao SAR China | 2,006 | 0.21% |
| Morocco | 1,527 | 0.16% |
| Austria | 1,477 | 0.16% |
| Denmark | 1,459 | 0.16% |
| Ghana | 1,434 | 0.15% |
| Serbia | 1,390 | 0.15% |
| Norway | 1,370 | 0.15% |
| Kenya | 1,321 | 0.14% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1,243 | 0.13% |
| Hungary | 1,217 | 0.13% |
| New Zealand | 1,158 | 0.12% |
| Vietnam | 1,029 | 0.11% |
| Czechia | 789 | 0.08% |
| Bulgaria | 737 | 0.08% |
| Ethiopia | 718 | 0.08% |
| Bangladesh | 711 | 0.08% |
| Argentina | 644 | 0.07% |
| Jordan | 596 | 0.06% |
| Bahrain | 558 | 0.06% |
| Sri Lanka | 540 | 0.06% |
| Uganda | 538 | 0.06% |
| Kazakhstan | 529 | 0.06% |
| Qatar | 527 | 0.06% |
| Croatia | 519 | 0.06% |
| Lithuania | 518 | 0.06% |
| Latvia | 408 | 0.04% |
| Slovenia | 394 | 0.04% |
| Mozambique | 393 | 0.04% |
| Iraq | 376 | 0.04% |
| Lebanon | 365 | 0.04% |
| Angola | 355 | 0.04% |
| Ukraine | 336 | 0.04% |
| Cyprus | 326 | 0.03% |
| Luxembourg | 288 | 0.03% |
| Tanzania | 263 | 0.03% |
| Algeria | 248 | 0.03% |
| Estonia | 239 | 0.03% |
| Oman | 227 | 0.02% |
| Tunisia | 217 | 0.02% |
| Senegal | 199 | 0.02% |
| Slovakia | 191 | 0.02% |
| Iran | 181 | 0.02% |
| Malta | 176 | 0.02% |
| Malawi | 172 | 0.02% |
| Bolivia | 160 | 0.02% |
| Puerto Rico | 159 | 0.02% |
| Libya | 155 | 0.02% |
| Nepal | 141 | 0.02% |
| Burkina Faso | 141 | 0.02% |
| Palestinian Territories | 138 | 0.01% |
| Yemen | 130 | 0.01% |
| Albania | 129 | 0.01% |
| Uruguay | 128 | 0.01% |
| Montenegro | 128 | 0.01% |
| Cameroon | 128 | 0.01% |
| Venezuela | 122 | 0.01% |
| Zimbabwe | 117 | 0.01% |
| Benin | 117 | 0.01% |
| Dominican Republic | 111 | 0.01% |
| South Sudan | 110 | 0.01% |
| Paraguay | 109 | 0.01% |
| Costa Rica | 107 | 0.01% |
| Iceland | 106 | 0.01% |
| Cambodia | 97 | 0.01% |
| Moldova | 96 | 0.01% |
| Rwanda | 91 | 0.01% |
| Fiji | 90 | 0.01% |
| Kuwait | 89 | 0.01% |
| North Macedonia | 88 | 0.01% |
| Togo | 85 | 0.01% |
| Seychelles | 84 | 0.01% |
| Myanmar (Burma) | 78 | 0.01% |
| Bosnia & Herzegovina | 76 | 0.01% |
| Zambia | 72 | 0.01% |
| Congo - Kinshasa | 68 | 0.01% |
| Uzbekistan | 67 | 0.01% |
| Nicaragua | 63 | 0.01% |
| Cape Verde | 63 | 0.01% |
| Guatemala | 61 | 0.01% |
| Gambia | 59 | 0.01% |
| Panama | 58 | 0.01% |
| Mali | 55 | 0.01% |
| Gibraltar | 53 | 0.01% |
| Mauritius | 45 | 0.00% |
| El Salvador | 42 | 0.00% |
| Maldives | 42 | 0.00% |
| Botswana | 42 | 0.00% |
| Trinidad & Tobago | 41 | 0.00% |
| Somalia | 41 | 0.00% |
| Armenia | 40 | 0.00% |
| Georgia | 38 | 0.00% |
| Mongolia | 36 | 0.00% |
| Belarus | 33 | 0.00% |
| Honduras | 28 | 0.00% |
| Brunei | 27 | 0.00% |
| Jamaica | 23 | 0.00% |
| Côte d’Ivoire | 23 | 0.00% |
| Namibia | 20 | 0.00% |
| Laos | 20 | 0.00% |
| American Samoa | 20 | 0.00% |
| Andorra | 20 | 0.00% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 18 | 0.00% |
| Monaco | 17 | 0.00% |
| Cuba | 16 | 0.00% |
| Burundi | 16 | 0.00% |
| Afghanistan | 14 | 0.00% |
| Syria | 13 | 0.00% |
| Sudan | 13 | 0.00% |
| Niger | 13 | 0.00% |
| Liberia | 13 | 0.00% |
| Azerbaijan | 13 | 0.00% |
| Kosovo | 12 | 0.00% |
| Guyana | 12 | 0.00% |
| Congo - Brazzaville | 12 | 0.00% |
| Liechtenstein | 11 | 0.00% |
| St. Kitts & Nevis | 11 | 0.00% |
| Timor-Leste | 10 | 0.00% |
| Réunion | 10 | 0.00% |
| Tonga | 9 | 0.00% |
| Sierra Leone | 9 | 0.00% |
| Vanuatu | 8 | 0.00% |
| Bhutan | 8 | 0.00% |
| British Virgin Islands | 7 | 0.00% |
| Jersey | 7 | 0.00% |
| Gabon | 7 | 0.00% |
| Barbados | 7 | 0.00% |
| Bahamas | 6 | 0.00% |
| Belize | 5 | 0.00% |
| Martinique | 4 | 0.00% |
| Isle of Man | 4 | 0.00% |
| Grenada | 4 | 0.00% |
| Chad | 3 | 0.00% |
| Madagascar | 3 | 0.00% |
| Tajikistan | 2 | 0.00% |
| São Tomé & Príncipe | 2 | 0.00% |
| French Polynesia | 2 | 0.00% |
| Cayman Islands | 2 | 0.00% |
| Aruba | 2 | 0.00% |
| St. Vincent & Grenadines | 1 | 0.00% |
| Eswatini | 1 | 0.00% |
| Suriname | 1 | 0.00% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 0.00% |
| Haiti | 1 | 0.00% |
| Guam | 1 | 0.00% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 0.00% |
| Guinea | 1 | 0.00% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 0.00% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 0.00% |
| Antigua & Barbuda | 1 | 0.00% |
No locations match your search. Try another name.
*Share of the 936,355 views in the geographic export. A separate “European Union” entry (6 views) is included in that total but excluded from the country and territory list. The listed locations sum to 936,349 views. Percentages are rounded.
Our story
From a clear purpose
to a global community.
Launched in March 2020, INPLASY provides an international platform for registering evidence synthesis protocols, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
The beginning
INPLASY launches with a focus on transparent, accessible protocol registration.
1,400+ protocols
Authors from 25 countries contribute records during the platform’s first year.
A published analysis
A research article examines 4,658 registered protocols, platform features and website statistics.
100 countries
A milestone in international participation, with more than 9,700 protocols registered on the platform.
Making research easier to discover.
A public protocol helps researchers identify ongoing work, examine planned methods and track changes. Searching existing reviews and registrations remains an essential step before starting a new project.
Explore the protocol databasePart of the evidence synthesis landscape.
INPLASY was included among the resources for identifying ongoing reviews in McMaster University’s COVID-END guidance of June 2020. Our platform’s first three years were also examined in a published research article.
Read the 2023 platform analysis ↗Our values
The principles behind
every public record.
We combine a commitment to research transparency with an efficient administrative process and a registration target of under 48 hours.
Integrity & principles
Transparency is at the heart of a reliable research record.
Equality & respect
Submissions receive equal treatment, regardless of country or nationality.
Quality & discipline
Structured records and administrative checks support clear reporting.
Innovation & learning
We keep improving how researchers register and share their methods.
Commitment
We support researchers in making their planned methods publicly available.
Teamwork & inspiration
Shared expertise and collaboration strengthen our work.
People make this mission possible.Meet the team contributing to INPLASY’s work.
Meet our teamBe part of our global community
Make your next research
protocol a public record.
Join researchers around the world in making evidence synthesis methods visible from the start.
About these figures & references
Reporting period and definitions
Website analytics cover 1 May 2020 to 16 September 2026. The overview reports 937.1K website views and 248.6K visitors; these are rounded values. Visitors are an analytics measure and do not represent registered user accounts.
The geographic export contains 936,355 views across 193 location labels. Removing the regional “European Union” label from the location count yields 192 countries and territories. The overview and geographic export have different totals and are reported separately here.
The protocol registration list contains 100 standardized country entries. Website analytics retain the location names and territory categories supplied by the analytics platform, so these two geographic counts use different definitions. The “9,700+ registered protocols” milestone reflects the INPLASY homepage consulted on 16 September 2026.
Selected publications & references
- Canellas JVdS, Borges FCP. How should retrospectively registered protocols be interpreted in systematic reviews? Systematic Reviews. 2026;15:210. doi:10.1186/s13643-026-03278-8.
- Ferreira RT et al. What evidence syntheses reveal about PROSPERO, INPLASY, OSF, the Research Registry, and protocols.io: a meta-research study. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2026;11:1738112. doi:10.3389/frma.2026.1738112.
- Borges FCP et al. Contemporary practices in scoping review protocol registration: a meta-research analysis of high-impact health journals (2024–2025). BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2026;26:194. doi:10.1186/s12874-026-02919-9.
- Canellas et al. The international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) at 3 years: an analysis of 4,658 registered protocols on inplasy.com, platform features, and website statistics. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2023. Read article.
- Solla F, Bertoncelli CM, Rampal V. Does the PROSPERO registration prevent double review on the same topic? BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2020. Read article.
- McMaster University. COVID-END resources for researchers. Guidance on identifying ongoing reviews and avoiding duplication, June 2020, section 2.2.2. View guidance (PDF).
